Guidelines

Practicum (DATS 5990)

Credits and Enrollment

Students may enroll in one or two course units. One CU in a single semester is typical. Two CUs in one semester may be allowed at the advisor’s and Projects Director’s discretion based on project scope.

Advisor Requirements

Any Penn faculty member can serve as your advisor. If your advisor is outside SEAS, the Projects Director will nominally co-advise.

Industry Projects

Industry-proposed practicums are acceptable provided they produce a tangible, academically-based product that the Projects Director can evaluate — for example, a research paper, a rigorous evaluation of a novel method, or a reproducible analysis with clear findings. A consulting deliverable (a dashboard, a report without a research question, or data cleaning for a client) does not qualify on its own. You cannot receive payment for a project you are also enrolling for practicum credit.

This covers self-arranged industry projects within the faculty-advised practicum. If you want a Penn-matched sponsor project instead, see the Industry Capstone (DATS 5990-002) page — a separate section with its own application process, structure, and grading.

Team Projects

You may work as a team of 2–3 students if your faculty advisor approves and each team member has a clearly distinct set of deliverables. This should be specified in the advisor agreement form.

Mid-Semester Check-In

You are expected to meet with your faculty advisor and the Projects Director around the mid-semester mark. Come prepared with one of: a brief slide deck showing your progress, a live demo, or a written report outline. The check-in is a calibration point — the goal is to surface problems early, not to evaluate finished work.

Report Requirements

Your practicum report should be 5–10 pages and include:

Submit your report as a PDF by the deadline on the Timeline. Code should be in a maintained repository (e.g., GitHub), not a one-time upload.

Presentation

Practicum students present posters at DATS Presentation Day.

Poster specifications:

What makes a good poster:

How Grades Are Determined

Your grade combines your advisor’s assessment with the Projects Director’s review of your deliverables — your progress against the milestones in your proposal, the quality of your final report, and how well you present and explain the work. There is no single formula; students who maintain steady progress, communicate proactively, and deliver a clear final report typically do well. See the Evaluation Rubric for the specific dimensions you and your advisor can use to assess the work.


Thesis (DATS 9990)

Credits and Enrollment

A thesis requires two course units: 1 CU per semester over two consecutive semesters. You receive a letter grade each semester with deliverables due at the end of each.

Advisor Requirements

Any Penn faculty member can serve as your advisor. You will also need a separate reader who is Penn faculty to review the final thesis.

Semester 1: Foundation

The first semester is for building — not finishing. Focus on:

The interim report is graded. It should demonstrate that you have a clear research direction and have made substantive early progress — not that you’ve finished.

Semester 2: Execution and Writing

The second semester is for completing your research and writing your thesis. Key expectations:

Work with your advisor to set clear milestones for both semesters at the start. The most common failure mode is underestimating how long writing takes — start drafting sections as you go, not only at the end.

Mid-Semester Check-In

Same as Practicum: meet with your faculty advisor and the Projects Director around the mid-semester mark with a slide deck, demo, or report outline. For thesis students this is particularly important in semester 1, when a scope problem caught early is fixable but caught late becomes a crisis.

Report Requirements

Your thesis must follow SEAS formatting guidelines: Masters Thesis Guidelines

Title page signatures required:

  1. Your Faculty Advisor
  2. DATS Projects Director (Dr. Guntuku) — sharathg@seas.upenn.edu
  3. DATS Program Director (Prof. Susan Davidson) — susan@seas.upenn.edu

Sample title page: DATS Thesis Title Page Template (PDF)

For citations, follow the Chicago Manual of Style, the MLA Handbook, or the appropriate manual for your field.

Code should be in a maintained repository with a README sufficient for someone to reproduce your results.

Submission

Submit your completed and signed thesis electronically to grad-affairs@seas.upenn.edu by the deadline on the Timeline. An approved copy also goes to the CIS Master’s chair via email.

Presentation

Thesis students deliver a 5-minute presentation at DATS Presentation Day. Practice your talk at least twice — five minutes is harder to fill well than it sounds.

How Grades Are Determined

Each semester is graded independently. Semester 1 is judged mainly on the quality and completeness of your interim report, your progress on the research foundations (literature, problem formulation, data), and your advisor’s assessment of engagement. Semester 2 is judged on the quality of the final thesis, your presentation, and your overall contribution. The Evaluation Rubric below lays out the dimensions in detail — thesis work is held to the higher bar across every dimension and is additionally expected to demonstrate a novel contribution.

If you fall behind, communicate early — advisors can help recalibrate scope; they cannot help if they don’t know there’s a problem.


Evaluation Rubric

This rubric is a shared tool for students and advisors. Use it before each check-in and before final submission: rate the work on each dimension, and address any “Developing” areas while there’s still time. It is not a point formula — advisors weigh the dimensions holistically alongside the difficulty and scope of your project.

Dimension Developing Proficient Exemplary
Problem & motivation Question vague or overly broad; significance unclear. Clear, well-scoped question with a stated motivation. Sharp question grounded in a real gap; significance is compelling.
Background & related work Little engagement with prior work; gap not identified. Relevant prior work summarized; the gap is identified. Critical synthesis that clearly positions the contribution.
Methods & rigor Methods unclear, unjustified, or not reproducible. Sound, appropriate methods, clearly described and reproducible. Well-justified and rigorous, with thoughtful baselines or validation.
Results & interpretation Results incomplete or unsupported; limitations ignored. Results clearly presented and correctly interpreted; limitations noted. Thoroughly analyzed, honestly caveated, tied back to the question.
Communication Report or poster hard to follow; key message buried. Clear structure; figures support the argument; message easy to find. Polished and persuasive; figures carry the story; confident delivery.
Independence & engagement Reactive; misses check-ins; advisor drives the work. Reliable progress; prepared for meetings; raises blockers early. Drives the project; sets the agenda; turns feedback into momentum.

Track differences:


Working with Your Advisor

The advisor relationship is the most important factor in a successful thesis or practicum. A few practices that help:


Deliverable Uploads

All students (thesis and practicum) must upload their presentations and poster PDFs to the shared Google Drive folder before Presentation Day. The upload link will be shared each semester.

Accelerated Master's students still enrolled in their Penn undergrad program follow the undergraduate calendar and their undergraduate home school's policies.

After You Finish

Your project doesn’t have to end when the grade is posted. A few things worth doing: